![]() Thus, even with basic maintenance mode you can enjoy great code reviews in our products. They are mature products with a vast feature set. Please also keep in mind that Fisheye and Crucible are not end of life. On the positive side, Upsource runs IDEA's code analysis engine under the hood, so for example you can enjoy symbol navigation, searching for code references etc. ![]() Other features missing were file-level comments, multi-line comments, defect tracking, comment drafts, advanced search. ![]() I checked version 3.5 few years ago and it didn't allow to upload patches or attachments to a code review, also adding entire files from a repository was not possible. TFS, Bazaar it also supports 15+ issue trackers (and not only Jira).Īnother tool, Upsource has feature set quite similar to Fisheye & Crucible, although it does not support CVS. On the positive side, Review Board supports much more SCM types, e.g. An overview on how Atlassian's FishEye unlocks Subversion, Git, Perforce, Clearcase and CVS with real-time notifications of code changes plus web-based repor. ![]() Iterative reviews are supported only partially, a unified diff is not available. Just keep in mind that they may not offer the same set of features as Fisheye and Crucible.įor example, in Review Board (based on my experience with 2.x version few years ago, they may have added more features since then) there's no possibility to browse repositories, no possibility to search content of repositories or to view diffs from a repository (I mean without creating a code review), also no web hooks, no smart commits, no repository/user activity, no charts and metrics. In case you use other SCMs, like Subversion, Mercurial or Perforce then some of alternatives are: Review Board, Upsource, Helix. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |